Заглавная страница
Hibitors Medications: anticoagulation Drugs: Aspirin (or clopidogrel) Drugs: aldosterone antagonist Medicines Hibitors Drugs: anticoagulation Drugs: Aspirin (or clopidogrel) Drugs: aldosterone antagonist Drugs: ICD/CRT-D Medicines: beta-blocker Medicines: CRT-P/CRT-D Medicines: adjustments in statins (1 month) Medicines: changes in statins (1 year) Behavioural interventions: diet plan guidance Behavioural interventions: smoking assessment Behavioural interventions: exercising guidance Behavioural interventions: self-management support Behavioural interventions: HF education Composite outcomesAbbreviations: ACE inhibitor, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; BP, blood pressure; CI, self-confidence interval; CRT-D, cardio-resynchronization therapy with defibrillator; CRT-P, cardio-resynchronization therapy with pacemaker; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1C; ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator; NR, not reported; RCT, randomized clinical trial. a Information of individual GRADE assessments are out there in Appendix 3. b Pool effect estimate.Ontario Overall health Technology Assessment Series; Vol. 13: No. 11, pp. 1?6, SeptemberMeasures of EfficiencyThere was proof that an electronic discharge summary was received in as timely a manner as paperbased discharge summaries; general, the proof didn't demonstrate enhanced efficiency (Table 37).Table 37: Summary of Measures of EfficiencyOutcome Influence on Time Proportion of PCPs getting discharge summary within 1? days Time to 1st measure of LDL-C, days Time for you to change in statin prescription Time spent by providers with individuals Time spent by nurses with sufferers Influence on Communication Number of letters from GP to consultant Number of letters from consultant to GP Quantity of patient contacts with GP Number of patient contacts with consultant 1 (RCT) 1 (RCT) 1 (RCT) 1 (RCT) NR NR NR NR Not considerable Substantial raise Not considerable Not important Quite low Pretty low Pretty low Pretty low 1 (RCT) 1 (RCT) 1 (RCT) 1 (Observational) 1 (Observational) Risk difference Imply distinction Imply difference Imply difference Mean difference 1.1 (?.two to six.9) ?2.0 (?2.9 to 38.9) High Moderate Quantity of Research Statistical Strategy Impact Estimate (95 CI) GRADEa?.1 (?two.0 to ?.2) Moderate four.five (1.83?.17) 3.00 (0.67?.33) Quite low Quite lowAbbreviations: CI, self-assurance interval; GP, common practitioner; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NR, not reported; PCP, principal care doctor; RCT, randomized clinical trial. a Facts of person GRADE assessments are available in Appendix 3.Ontario Overall health Technologies Assessment Series; Vol. 13: No. 11, pp. 1?six, SeptemberConclusionsThe findings from this evidence-based evaluation contact into query the ability of eTools to independently increase the excellent of outpatient care coordination. Though automation is intended to facilitate consistency in application and measurement, eTools could not be capable of overcome underlying process inefficiencies. That stated, determined by the findings from this report, there does not seem to be proof of patient harm together with the implementation of eTools in.